X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=EvfGpsX/VidZ+H7Qjt2QkTS3EShm3YyVDw6ufqFVFV8=;
        b=XZ+ublTihIUBWRZNR62JisT0Se2nM8A+aFTQs6f9VGHmXaQDYUWLY7Y3eezOz815Ri
         c7lmyT775UArHnkWkKhPiahg4INxjNfCnyLP7IoVSyEyU8HsojsnDNZf9BztAh9Gawiy
         bWycEbMODf+n++8ri2Oayyyti0AjBEJmDBsCg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201107012141.p61LfQ1X031930@envy.delorie.com>
References: <BANLkTikW3CVu0QEHyFwgfpvzqNoMR6Tfrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83tyb6qce3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<BANLkTi=q_JbhptgWTi8ZN7mtq9NO9zPX0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011526 DOT p61FQs24012782 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=BU4UzOR+RtD9hJRCtKq6eR3AYog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011539 DOT p61FdYjI013658 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=HfCnAD4WUndyU_bdnP6wXuOPo0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011548 DOT p61FmWQW014052 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTinA0i1sOT4tM4igv6Y1aR+3vdnNJg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011557 DOT p61FvXVP014582 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTim-07ErkunBix8U46KYFF497HKAPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011614 DOT p61GEu8r015173 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<4E0DFC80 DOT 2070607 AT iki DOT fi>
	<BANLkTinPMEVyiceCG5QEjRDsTwqWqfUuGg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=+dUg8py11+BweccQtUdum1pxApA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011734 DOT p61HYlRK019374 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=rTRfAoChLEvb+2QCFQNYkcFKTQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011753 DOT p61Hr3XO020234 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTinrOAihDo1B_uTbWccdOKfFXs7ujw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011814 DOT p61IERDY021019 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTimenPPmJOxj6GHMQ38nvzRcfPGQ+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011832 DOT p61IWPHI022600 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=BeUYBJs7CaZqNZ58=Cv7nKnvK2g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<BANLkTim67BLWYmxnx3kFLa4KJn=gtj+ugQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107012004 DOT p61K4HXO028104 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTimSWN9=TsWTWry59kwaqH+jZaBxRQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107012141 DOT p61LfQ1X031930 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 10:41:52 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=884z0Yf7xvMaRr54UHK6xzbG4Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gcc-4.4: conflicting types for built-in function 'cabs' and 'cabsf'
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:41 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> By "test" I meant "build a program and see if it returns the right
> value".
>

I know that already.

Today I can run a test on a real dos setup.  Give me a test.c
and I will run it for you.