X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GWlO0F01oepk7kWZPRMLRQ3KZQavStjrtytjDQSjm3o=; b=t5EQJSo9jWuL5z2QM7aOG9P4AGuhD4PT3Buu1ydpUM6fhxfi5MiiB3fSTzW2zNjArw 3MwACDDC+Fq/xqHOIl5TcJVwBCtWVKLTRU1IPqFyOnNauO5OwPGVkzq16DXR3+WUTeSS Yt/+Nx5td/6fUWvAn1xzNORYQwviGu5sPWERM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201107011832.p61IWPHI022600@envy.delorie.com> References: <83tyb6qce3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <201107011526 DOT p61FQs24012782 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201107011539 DOT p61FdYjI013658 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201107011548 DOT p61FmWQW014052 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201107011557 DOT p61FvXVP014582 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201107011614 DOT p61GEu8r015173 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <4E0DFC80 DOT 2070607 AT iki DOT fi> <201107011734 DOT p61HYlRK019374 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201107011753 DOT p61Hr3XO020234 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201107011814 DOT p61IERDY021019 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201107011832 DOT p61IWPHI022600 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 21:36:30 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gcc-4.4: conflicting types for built-in function 'cabs' and 'cabsf' From: Ozkan Sezer To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p61IaaZJ031312 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:32 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Hmmm... OK, I suppose. > > Can I assume you built and tested libm with your fix?  Does it return > the right values? > > We don't want to have to fix it twice... > Only build-tested (gcc 3.3.6 and 4.4.7), which was my only intention, but not run-tested. I'd like to leave run-testing to someone who is more accustomed to those functions than me. -- O.S.