X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:48:32 -0400
Message-Id: <201107011548.p61FmWQW014052@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=HfCnAD4WUndyU_bdnP6wXuOPo0A@mail.gmail.com> (message
	from Ozkan Sezer on Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:45:27 +0300)
Subject: Re: gcc-4.4: conflicting types for built-in function 'cabs' and 'cabsf'
References: <BANLkTikW3CVu0QEHyFwgfpvzqNoMR6Tfrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83tyb6qce3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<BANLkTi=q_JbhptgWTi8ZN7mtq9NO9zPX0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011526 DOT p61FQs24012782 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<BANLkTi=BU4UzOR+RtD9hJRCtKq6eR3AYog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011539 DOT p61FdYjI013658 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <BANLkTi=HfCnAD4WUndyU_bdnP6wXuOPo0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Then I suggest removing those two from build, like :

Do we need those prototypes for gcc's built-in versions?  Or should we
add implementations of those, with updated headers?