X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=hmQVZlcqLZ9Vv6ZzQxW+Tq550rlkc5UXBUicUnB/c/g=;
        b=lSdVVvnD1TwDNG/2gBDO/kV7rX9ZplKVPE+wfO1u5V0rlZIaZGocKWIPtozLJl/vyP
         pKQ14uxJIgMKr4XD6ICwYo+a9BtM/mD1sMdTT4ftCs3FtfTT8OwZ8LnZyorECIjdg6Vh
         4Lu805kf9TKkA7Xdpr+Amzchwq8jVu82YIlyM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201107011526.p61FQs24012782@envy.delorie.com>
References: <BANLkTikW3CVu0QEHyFwgfpvzqNoMR6Tfrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83tyb6qce3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<BANLkTi=q_JbhptgWTi8ZN7mtq9NO9zPX0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201107011526 DOT p61FQs24012782 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:37:44 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=BU4UzOR+RtD9hJRCtKq6eR3AYog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gcc-4.4: conflicting types for built-in function 'cabs' and 'cabsf'
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:26 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> double cabs(double complex z);
>
> Right, newer gccs have a real "complex" type, instead of a structure.
> Then yell at you if you disagree with them :-P
>

Exactly so.

And why does even djgpp libm bother with cabs[f] ?
It doesn't provide a complex.h, neither does it provide a
prototype of these functions elsewhere.

--
O.S.