X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <4DBD6DD2.4000904@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 17:27:30 +0300
From: Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djgpp*.djl
References: <4DBD4955 DOT 3060104 AT iki DOT fi> <BANLkTinjVbzzxZ=1ZNyXAJjrJboaodcCtw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinjVbzzxZ=1ZNyXAJjrJboaodcCtw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On 05/01/2011 03:12 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Andris Pavenis<andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi>  wrote:
>> Last GCC version which required djgpp*.djl was ancient 3.4.X and
>> corresponding file djgpp-x.djl was provided then already for some
>> time.
>>
>
> I for one still am using gcc-3.3.6 or 3.4.6 for my djgpp compilation needs...

That only influences those who are building DJGPP libc, libm and tools from
sources (from CVS version or beta djlsr204.zip). gcc-3.[34].X have own version
(djgpp-x.djl) which is being used instead of lib/djgpp.djl (therfore another
name)

Such removal could influence only those who are using really ancient gcc versions
like gcc-2.7.2.1, gcc-2.8.[01] and maybe some others.

>
>> Is it OK to remove all references to djgpp.djl and djgpp-x.djl
>> from djgpp/src/makefile.inc and corresponding file in djgpp/tests?
>>
>> File in djgpp/lib may still stay (or it also could be removed)
>>

Andris