X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:30:51 -0400
Message-Id: <200909210330.n8L3Upks017304@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <83k4ztugzn.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 21
	Sep 2009 06:14:04 +0300)
Subject: Re: [brobecker AT adacore DOT com: GDB 6.8.91 available for testing]
References: <833a6jwd5d DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200909192120 DOT 52643 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <83vdjevfzt DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200909192333 DOT 50394 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <83skeiuqt9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200909210135 DOT n8L1Zn0r016634 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <83k4ztugzn DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Any specific GCC features that would allow it to handle this better?

More consistent and workable handling of pointer conversions,
basically.

> Or are you saying we should redefine NULL in DJGPP headers?

This one.