X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:09:08 +0300
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: Re: [brobecker AT adacore DOT com: GDB 6.8.91 available for testing]
In-reply-to: <COL101-W54A4F652CD7225412AE19CE6DE0@phx.gbl>
X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To: Jay K <jay DOT krell AT cornell DOT edu>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de
Message-id: <83r5u2um7f.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <833a6jwd5d DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200909192120 DOT 52643 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <83vdjevfzt DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200909192333 DOT 50394 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <83skeiuqt9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <COL101-W54A4F652CD7225412AE19CE6DE0 AT phx DOT gbl>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Jay K <jay DOT krell AT cornell DOT edu>
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:15:48 +0000
> 
> What happens if you do:
> 
>  
> 
> stddef.h, stdio.h, stdlib.h, etc.:
> 
> #ifndef NULL
> 
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> 
> #define NULL 0
> 
> #else
> 
> #define NULL ((void*)0)
> 
> #endif
> 
> #endif

I don't think we want to modify the definition of NULL in our system
headers.  It's perfectly valid, and gobs of DJGPP programs use the
current definition; we don't want to break them.