X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GE8wV559+TzEMzRu2PN+kLYdl8cau5/m+E9S1gZJyx0=; b=VHjDYwvYxehzvLo5VmA/ypTpD3KK+Tu3wL0VrfN8jUOyGEOaDtsg7luzNFMxd4pyM1 6fqEJ7TMRw3oJ/2CTqv2XDoyG8HmLsNpSYV8UbPSrzwahREqHKXc2ht/F1ts2pCbFZsN qQW+yL4YRC31mB+txssm7EXCoZZSZqba+VGf4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wnFpH4X02tOeDmvlf/g0+bDcTaeTvEQayfPF9+YvXvB2UZiR3vZrn1bvz8Wd3oXCD0 T2XA2y3dAwQQP58q0kDYjrwqXcjLh/xNCDKQja7HO0HfJ2lwrD8ZM8REeeCghSRfiom2 u6ppiqtKpk5MY0d911r/cEu8afxVqVcwsDuxU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090611163844.157270@gmx.net> References: <20090611151046 DOT 27260 AT gmx DOT net> <647fe9b10906110852wb57936ap67dfa83c2db0b9ed AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090611163844 DOT 157270 AT gmx DOT net> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:47:43 +0300 Message-ID: <647fe9b10906110947saaecbe3s9b5c4be42060f1a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: multiple definitions of _rdtsc From: Ozkan Sezer To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk >> > -unsigned long long _rdtsc(void); >> > +static unsigned long long _rdtsc(void); >> >> Why not just remove this line, do we really need >> the prototype? > Removing the prototype and keeping the function as "extern" > does not solve the issue. =A0It continues producing the error > reported. =A0If the prototype shall be removed then the function > must be "static" instead of "extern". ... which is what I actually meant. if it is an inline, just do it static and without protos, does it not work that way?