X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=aAWKaCffC05q2ilNTyPvljCdnvKRe7UqYMNHk2RVOYE=;
        b=fu2+GRLxfSi8jBGehaanxO+UpZSli60JUc5XUV47c5Jy2SwKJSYQ4mUiJ6RWDinWQT
         EGCKPP0/SxTuzECFmfXJDV53n+T0dVU6mDOtLpm/XHLquv9n1QetzSGWkDmL6V8N42+O
         insfGToLwN5mDwW1oi/Tuu/LXVgH7kGucbwFc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=WR9oggLlgEkVPXa5Z47eIkEvLgcCouzQbF2bzpQ3xL5fcSMZDbb+//jXblGeGV6Ciz
         8teyqF/B3v/pDhzkJkk73zlmntDdDUYAhizt2dChpQ/jyvMHmLQ5/i+BFC0m5w7ekTjE
         uieua1QiesgRn0MTY9sGpRkV3AR1XZBlOAhBs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090611151046.27260@gmx.net>
References: <20090611151046 DOT 27260 AT gmx DOT net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:52:45 +0300
Message-ID: <647fe9b10906110852wb57936ap67dfa83c2db0b9ed@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: multiple definitions of _rdtsc
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Juan Manuel
Guerrero<juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> -unsigned long long _rdtsc(void);
> +static unsigned long long _rdtsc(void);

Why not just remove this line, do we really need
the prototype?

--
Ozkan