X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=MD51X97b2Ao1j/LGhKtNe2QHuPrrJT/+GVayn9GsAYk=;
        b=q11iAtPFrYdCdMt6Tnrrl0TStJcP2r2TZt2tfJT0HfnsIiRCqVARHwqAfDMPpDusnq
         jBLQCD13DYc4iY7QjV97NZ7lQexmRY4+n5sGZdD9MYjRvB8IJHE5AX/t+TGOIr6ztuab
         9930ZoDHPGq3iVsAx7vv8TkJdfa35BDN+u3bY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=xcOc8yUt/L1l9P6nHgvaC/LHc9Y9UXUoNhH15MxtP35y7wepbfRW5sXCE1xRTUGznX
         XC8lOoCkaeNojBnrd84gSYB0krlM0rpdaGt1/ENYJUHMkgUnnmsG9NxEuu34hqipUSSr
         1wfwNFj6718KYOMVYvkx0DFC5ASqkCT8P0uJE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <83k55poktb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <000b01c9bb64$96fb11d0$2602a8c0 AT computername>
	 <647fe9b10904120454n307dfe77vb4934758b96dd33d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	 <83k55poktb DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:42:53 +0300
Message-ID: <647fe9b10904121042g3ca87074v9e65ec1efed90fa2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: mkstemp() declaration
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:54:26 +0300
>> From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
>>
>> > +@code{<sdtlib.h>}.  This is to archive Single Unix Specification compliance.
>>
>> I think s/archive/achive/ is needed here (just nitpicking ;))
>
> You mean, ``achieve'', right? ;-)
>

Oh yeah, today I'm typing with my toe, too ;))