X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=O2CnczsEkhmXrrOOR/y4asErGne8QfmS+OJDyeZ3ltw=;
        b=GYHlZIKGUMHMHcYbnbi4Gj9jEbV2l/CZdkNFdBj1RQL/YZCzaKlgqEnqJ67vZ+HU+7
         A38lAGPmy67ZBzjc0VXZi7otXbiM6BxfNtFaws417/zMHK9BMH0IEVx4GUwiubK4zoO4
         UONeXJ4Yw6Cn+ClKSBUP0APJvwewyso/A0Vwk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=wcBgqk2yGzvMQBmuARjWXehyOps6odMRMdWqzCrfRatanvT22NOmsAYDkz0jnq0+aU
         6wiarG9jximWUUD+BgBdjV/Paym4YYXvdj5zfWJg3pzhps7w74mzNnyN4TjfCUylVM/s
         7BU0x4siWFDrR1BSq6B60oCCtX1/4sZYNFNrU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <000b01c9bb64$96fb11d0$2602a8c0@computername>
References: <000b01c9bb64$96fb11d0$2602a8c0 AT computername>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:54:26 +0300
Message-ID: <647fe9b10904120454n307dfe77vb4934758b96dd33d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: mkstemp() declaration
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero
<juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> Here is a new patch taking into account the issues proposed:
> - functions prototypes are kept in stdio.h for backward compatibility.
> - a note has been added to the .txh files explaining that prototypes are now in
>  stdlib.h and kept in stdio.h for backward compatibility.
>
> If there are no objections until tomorrow I will apply the patch.
>
>
> Regards,
> Juan M. Guerrero

> +@code{<sdtlib.h>}.  This is to archive Single Unix Specification compliance.

I think s/archive/achive/ is needed here (just nitpicking ;))

--
Ozkan