X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:51:10 -0700
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Subject: Re: restrict keyword
In-reply-to: <po13u0d5utt13bu5po82aqt9ckvvfv1bne@4ax.com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <cdvbu0t52me63clarhma3bq0blfitn46jr@4ax.com>
Organization: Systematic Software
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <q8cmt0p9e3ri4p17udh3lvk1gdrfoclb31 AT 4ax DOT com>
 <200501091459 DOT j09ExiLO022171 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
 <po13u0d5utt13bu5po82aqt9ckvvfv1bne AT 4ax DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j0D4ptcd001948
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:35:03 -0700, Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> wrote:

>On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:59:44 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:
>
>>> >According to Brian Inglis:
>>> >> I'd suggest one or more underscores _restrict or _RESTRICT_ or
>>> >> __restrict__. 
>>
>>Oh yes. When I use __restrict__ there are no complaints from gcc, so
>>we can forget about this:
>>
>>> >+#if __GNUC__ < 3 || __GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < what!!!!
>>> >#define __restrict__
>>...
>>> >#endif
>
>We still need that code if we are going to support gcc versions
>earlier than whenever __restrict__ was added. 

Anyone know (how to find out) in which version of gcc the patch
in the message below was included?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1998-10/msg00356.html

-- 
Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis