X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Message-Id: <200501071937.j07Jbagp010602@speedy.ludd.ltu.se> Subject: Re: *time_r patch In-Reply-To: "from Brian Inglis at Jan 6, 2005 00:16:24 am" To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:37:36 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-ltu-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ltu-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk According to Brian Inglis: 1. > Index: tests/libc/ansi/time/ctime.c 2. > =================================================================== 3. > RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/tests/libc/ansi/time/ctime.c,v 4. > diff -u -p ctime.c 5. > --- /dev/null 2005-01-05 23:24:37.000000000 -0700 6. > +++ time.c 2005-01-05 23:24:16.000000000 -0700 7. > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ 8. > +/* ctime.c - basic ISO and POSIX time function calls */ Ohoy there! tests/libc/ansi/time/ctime.c (line 1), ctime.c (line 4 and 8) but time.c (line 6)! Note the missing "c". Line 4 hasn't the full name either, which mean (c)time.c won't be created in the proper place. At least it wasn't with my version of patch. (That could be my old patch or bad parameter from me.) Please make a little better patches. While I certainly do appreciate the work you do, you should try to make it easy for those who are trying to apply the patches. Right, MartinS