X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:57:23 -0700
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Subject: Re: More complaints from tests/libclink/check
In-reply-to: <200501010119.j011JVxi015678@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <b24ct0djfmkn9sq8tjr2df792rfhdf4d0e@4ax.com>
Organization: Systematic Software
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <nl8bt0dmp86bl0u788bc1i98l0plk2tipn AT 4ax DOT com>
 <200501010119 DOT j011JVxi015678 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j012vmKP026689
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 02:19:31 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:

>According to Brian Inglis:
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:42:52 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:
>...
>> >Missing POSIX functions:
>> >asctime_r
>> >ctime_r
>> >gmtime_r 
>> >localtime_r 
>> >strptime
>> 
>> I can supply those as part of my changes to time functions. 
>
>Let's hear it! (Post the patches, i.e.)

How do we want to handle these?
The ISO functions become wrappers which define static storage and call
the POSIX *_r functions. 
Do we want to define the POSIX functions as _*_r and then use the
_/environ approach to define them when referenced, have the POSIX
headers #define *_r as _*_r, or have POSIX functions *_r call _*_r?

-- 
Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis

Business:  +1(403)547-8816 	Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca
Residence: +1(403)239-6520 	BWInglis AT Shaw DOT ca