X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: <ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
Message-Id: <200501010226.j012QXA2017691@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
Subject: Re: More complaints from tests/libclink/check
In-Reply-To: <53.1e0906df.2f075c22@aol.com> "from Kbwms@aol.com at Dec 31, 2004
 08:51:30 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 03:26:33 +0100 (CET)
CC: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-ltu-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ltu-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Kbwms AT aol DOT com:
> At this point, it is not clear to me that the float and double versions of 
> math functions in our math library satisfy C99 (as amended).  If it doesn't 
> matter, perhaps 
> 
> >  2. add what we got right now.
> 
> would work out satisfactorily.

Ok. To get something rolling, I suggest I commit something and let it
take it's course. Anyone opposed?

What?
<ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/contrib/kbwilliams-newlongs_dt00.zip>?

N.B.: If there's no complaints something will be commited soon (when
I've figured out what to commit). We are living in a dangerous time,
but perhaps New Year's sobriety is over when it's time to commit?


Right,

						MartinS