X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: <ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
Message-Id: <200501010113.j011D0Rf006254@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
Subject: Re: More complaints from tests/libclink/check
In-Reply-To: <1eb.315f8dbf.2f073f56@aol.com> "from Kbwms@aol.com at Dec 31, 2004
 06:48:38 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 02:13:00 +0100 (CET)
CC: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-ltu-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ltu-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I'm CC-ing Kbwms AT aol DOT com as I'm not sure (s)he's on this list (thanks
Eli for the coder's email).

According to Kbwms AT aol DOT com:
> In a message dated 12/31/2004 1:49:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, eliz AT gnu DOT org 
> writes:
> 
> > They might.  You should be able to find them here:
> > 
> >   ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/contrib/kbwilliams-newlongs_dt00.zip
> > 
> > You can talk to K.B. Williams, who worked on that stuff (CC'ed), if
> > you have any questions.  (The first question I'd ask is whether
> > there's a newer version of these functions.)
> 
> At this moment, the long double functions are incomplete.  There are certain 
> user interface problems that have to be worked out in the functions themselves 
> and the test suite has to be reworked.  I am only now getting back into 
> harness.  My best guess is that it will take at least four months to get everything 
> squared away.

Ok. Should we

0. wait for the long double versions to to complete,

1. add the non-long double versions and add the long double versions
later, or

2. add what we got right now.


I'm willing to do any of the above. A plus would be if we could do
this the nearest days as I think I'll have some time DJGPP _NOW_. If
we delay a week, my window of time is probably lost and we'll have to
wait a year or two or so...

This is not to put pressure on anyone. It's ok whatever happens; I'm
just stating my time availability.


Right,

						MartinS