X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:27:28 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <01c4e854$Blat.v2.2.2$09be9b80@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2
In-reply-to: <bbvhs05qaa8gghciljptu89vojtvkk2i47@4ax.com> (message from Brian
	Inglis on Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:03:05 -0700)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU gzip-1.3.5 uploaded
References: <1103476827 DOT 41c5b85b491aa AT webmail DOT wilkes DOT edu>
 <200412191748 DOT iBJHmmaM005825 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <01c4e604$Blat.v2.2.2$63db7180 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
 <38obs0ddbi3hjj9rj1753em0fi7qcm20or AT 4ax DOT com>
 <01c4e718$Blat.v2.2.2$633278e0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
 <200412211534 DOT iBLFYXii019390 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <01c4e797$Blat.v2.2.2$6714a260 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
 <bbvhs05qaa8gghciljptu89vojtvkk2i47 AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:03:05 -0700
> From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
> 
> As a first approx, embed the 2.04 symlink() routine, renamed to
> softlink(), into the 2.03 symlink() module, and call softlink() where
> the 2.03 symlink() returns EXDEV. 

In addition to this, there's this snippet at the end of `symlink' from
v2.03:

  if (spawnlp (P_WAIT, STUBIFY, STUBIFY, "-g", dest_abs, (char *)0)
      || spawnlp (P_WAIT, STUBEDIT, STUBEDIT, dest_abs, ropt, (char *)0))
    return -1;

Should we create a v2.04 style symlink if stubify and/or stubedit
failed in this fragment?  I don't know.

Also, there were discussions in the past (check the archives of this
list) about some tricky situations with using the stub-style symlinks.
It would be nice to make sure those issues are covered.

Finally, please make sure the code you suggest allows to make a v2.04
style symlink foo -> bar when there's both bar and bar.exe in that
directory.