X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patches to build GDB 6.3
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:52:42 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <01c4c987$Blat.v2.2.2$52b9e920 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <200412071838 DOT 09466 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <200412071638 DOT iB7GcUjp002093 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <200412071638.iB7GcUjp002093@envy.delorie.com>
Cc: dj AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200412071852.42299.pavenis@latnet.lv>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fgi.fi
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Tuesday 07 December 2004 18:38, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > Is there any reason not to just stay with the numbering we had before?
> >
> > It breaks GDB. It was less noticable in earlier versions, but for example
> > GDB-6.3 is unusable with out previous numbering
>
> So, the new scheme is compatible with the new gdb, yes?

As far as I have tested (I need more testing still)

> In that case, perhaps we should add gdb to the list of things to
> coordinate with 2.04 and 4.0.

If we change things only beginning with GCC-4.0, then new GDB versions will be 
unusable with for example gcc-3.4.3.

Andris