X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: <ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
Message-Id: <200410291605.i9TG5pwR022734@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
Subject: Re: gcc-3.4 and djgpp/src/debug/common/dbgcom.c
In-Reply-To: <200410282119.28711.pavenis@latnet.lv> "from Andris Pavenis at Oct
 28, 2004 09:19:28 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:05:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-ltu-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ltu-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Andris Pavenis:
> On Wednesday 27 October 2004 19:43, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Can we put it as an input operand of that big asm?  We don't have to
> > use it, just add it.
> >
> > asm("
> >    ...
> >    " : "g" (forced_test));
> 
> Unfortunatelly it doesn't work. Both gcc-3.4.2 and gcc-4.0.0 20041014 rejects
> extended inline assembler outside the procedures.

I suspect that then you could put it in any function... But... Well...
Is there any reason why we shouldn't use "__attribute__((unused))"?
Or doesn't that work either?


Right,

						MartinS