X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GCC-3.4.2
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:34:32 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
Cc: DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <200409301704 DOT i8UH4nUu020036 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
In-Reply-To: <200409301704.i8UH4nUu020036@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200410011034.32461.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Thursday 30 September 2004 20:04, ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote:
>
> Do I understand you correctly that you know that your gpp package
> doesn't work on 386s? "Work" here means that the compiler _and_ the
> executables it builds do run on a 386. (I know that some older version
> didn't make workable 386 executables.)
>
> No, I misunderstood something:
>  Then I guess we don't know if it does work or not. But 1 below
>  should be considered.

For some gcc versions there were no correct support of 386 in libstdc++.
Now it is AFAIK. However I have not tested it (and I don't have any 386 
machine around me where I could test)

Also: I'm myself am not too interested in building and testing binaries for 
DJGPP v2.03 any more, when I have got v2.04 and related tools working 
normally under WinXP (there were problems at start). So I'm beginning to 
think about generating gcc source archive, testing it using CVS versions of 
DJGPP v2.04 and providing source archive for somebody else to build and test 
it with DJGPP v2.03. Perhaps I could also generate documentation archives (I 
can do it under Linux and I perhaps will build new GCC versions for it)

Andris