X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Message-ID: <40046E53.40209@phekda.gotadsl.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:16:51 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031031
X-Accept-Language: en, de, fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Use of FILE in sprintf/sscanf
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401051334160 DOT 4628 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> <4002FE15 DOT 8040707 AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401131249170 DOT 16534 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0401131249170.16534@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Esa A E Peuha wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Richard Dawe wrote:
> 
> 
>>The code you committed for this was not the same as the code you posted.
>>If you're going to commit different code, please say why in a message to
>>djgpp-workers.
> 
> 
> I did post the code I committed (see djgpp-workers/2004/01/08/04:56:08,
> M-ID <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401081152420 DOT 23737 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>), or at
> least that was what I intended.  Did I somehow manage to mess it up?

No, it's me. I missed that message, when I was going through my mail box 
last night. Sorry.

>>Incidentally, I don't understand why it was commmitted to CVS, when Eli
>>was not happy with it.
> 
> 
> Eli was concerned about possible problems with debugging.  I asked what
> problems have been caused by having the current getc/putc code (also
> used in fgetc/fputc, fgets/fputs and getchar/putchar) as inline
> functions in a header.  Since Eli didn't answer that question, I assumed
> (perhaps mistakenly) that he didn't object to committing.  I am sorry if
> I was wrong.

If you're not sure, it's best to ask.

I think we agreed on the list sometime ago to wait a week before 
comitting things, so people have a chance to reply to mail. Waiting 
until after a weekend is a good idea. That's so that people can review 
patches at the weekend, when they may have more time.

Bye, Rich =]

PS: Sorry again about missing your second patch!

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone."
   -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek