X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:14:16 +0200 (EET)
From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Use of FILE in sprintf/sscanf
In-Reply-To: <4002FE15.8040707@phekda.gotadsl.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0401131249170.16534@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401051334160 DOT 4628 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
 <4002FE15 DOT 8040707 AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Richard Dawe wrote:

> The code you committed for this was not the same as the code you posted.
> If you're going to commit different code, please say why in a message to
> djgpp-workers.

I did post the code I committed (see djgpp-workers/2004/01/08/04:56:08,
M-ID <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401081152420 DOT 23737 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>), or at
least that was what I intended.  Did I somehow manage to mess it up?

> Incidentally, I don't understand why it was commmitted to CVS, when Eli
> was not happy with it.

Eli was concerned about possible problems with debugging.  I asked what
problems have been caused by having the current getc/putc code (also
used in fgetc/fputc, fgets/fputs and getchar/putchar) as inline
functions in a header.  Since Eli didn't answer that question, I assumed
(perhaps mistakenly) that he didn't object to committing.  I am sorry if
I was wrong.

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/