X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:11:23 +0200 (EET)
From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: stdbool.h and complex.h
In-Reply-To: <uu13623f7.fsf@elta.co.il>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0401081208450.23737@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401071356580 DOT 26260 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
 <uu13623f7 DOT fsf AT elta DOT co DOT il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> IMHO, it's better to at least have the unimplemented functions'
> prototypes ifdef'ed away on the header.  This assumes that a
> non-trivial amount of functions can be implemented quickly and
> committed together with the initial version of the header; otherwise,
> I'd suggest to wait with committing the header until we have a
> substantial body of its functions in the library.

Okay, I'll commit the functions first (in src/libc/c99/complex) and the
header afterwards.

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/