X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: 08 Jan 2004 11:30:20 +0200
Message-Id: <uu13623f7.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0401071356580.26260@sirppi.helsinki.fi> (message
	from Esa A E Peuha on Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:18:35 +0200 (EET))
Subject: Re: stdbool.h and complex.h
References:  <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0401071356580 DOT 26260 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:18:35 +0200 (EET)
> From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
> 
> Can I commit complex.h now and the functions later as I write them,
> or should I wait until I have all of them and then commit at the
> same time?

IMHO, it's better to at least have the unimplemented functions'
prototypes ifdef'ed away on the header.  This assumes that a
non-trivial amount of functions can be implemented quickly and
committed together with the initial version of the header; otherwise,
I'd suggest to wait with committing the header until we have a
substantial body of its functions in the library.