X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: 05 Jan 2004 07:53:03 +0200
Message-Id: <uk74754cg.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3FF880E9.2030702@phekda.gotadsl.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Sun, 04 Jan 2004 21:08:57 +0000)
Subject: Re: Patch for doprnt.c in djgpp v204 Beta
References: <127 DOT 381519e8 DOT 2d28a6e9 AT aol DOT com> <3FF880E9 DOT 2030702 AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 21:08:57 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> How about these renames:
> 
>      roundl -> strroundl
>      exponentl -> strexponentl

I'd rather go with doprint_roundl and doprint_exponentl.  That way, we
don't need to revisit this issue 10 years from now, when the next C
standard invents yet another set of standard functions and GCC makes
yet another set of built-ins that will cause it to whine about the
name conflict.