X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <2d.38425481.2d29e0a8@aol.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:33:28 EST Subject: Re: Patch for doprnt.c in djgpp v204 Beta To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_2d.38425481.2d29e0a8_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6021 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_2d.38425481.2d29e0a8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 1/4/2004 3:57:03 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20 rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk writes: > >So, change the name to Roundl, perhaps? Any objection to that one? >=20 > Sorry to be pedantic, but I think using case to distinguish two similar=20 > function names is a bad idea. >=20 Agreed. > How about these renames: >=20 > roundl -> strroundl > exponentl -> strexponentl >=20 That is entirely up to you. My original submission was as follows: > There continues to be a conflict with symbol 'roundl' in doprnt.c=20 > and the C99 function roundl().=A0 A suggested fix that works is: Any name changes that you choose are fine with me. My interest lies solely=20 in getting the thing compiled. --part1_2d.38425481.2d29e0a8_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 1/4/2004 3:57:03 P= M Eastern Standard Time, rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk writes:

>So, change the name to Rou= ndl, perhaps?  Any objection to that one?

Sorry to be pedantic, but I think using case to distinguish two similar
function names is a bad idea.



A= greed.

How about these renames:

   roundl -> strroundl
   exponentl -> strexponentl

<= BR> That is entirely up to you.  My original submission was as follows:

> There continues to be a conflict with symbol 'roundl' in doprnt.c
> and the C99 function roundl().=A0 A suggested fix that works is:

Any name changes that you choose are fine with me.  My interest lies so= lely in getting the thing compiled.

 --part1_2d.38425481.2d29e0a8_boundary--