X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <127.381519e8.2d28a6e9@aol.com> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 18:14:49 EST Subject: Re: Patch for doprnt.c in djgpp v204 Beta To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_127.381519e8.2d28a6e9_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6021 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_127.381519e8.2d28a6e9_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/3/2004 5:38:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk writes: > I don't think renaming it to __roundl is the right solution. If we ever > use (the C99) roundl in a non-C99 function in libc, we will need a stub > for it, to avoid polluting the global namespace. In that case, (the C99) > roundl will be available in two versions: a stub called roundl for C99 > programs and a stub called __roundl that will be used internally in the > library. So there will still be a clash. > So, change the name to Roundl, perhaps? Any objection to that one? --part1_127.381519e8.2d28a6e9_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 1/3/2004 5:38:15 P= M Eastern Standard Time, rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk writes:

I don't think renaming it to _= _roundl is the right solution. If we ever
use (the C99) roundl in a non-C99 function in libc, we will need a stub
for it, to avoid polluting the global namespace. In that case, (the C99) roundl will be available in two versions: a stub called roundl for C99
programs and a stub called __roundl that will be used internally in the
library. So there will still be a clash.

<= BR> So, change the name to Roundl, perhaps?  Any objection to that one? --part1_127.381519e8.2d28a6e9_boundary--