X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <15d.29de6b17.2d0f8afe@aol.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:09:02 EST Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 beta 1 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_15d.29de6b17.2d0f8afe_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6021 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com --part1_15d.29de6b17.2d0f8afe_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/15/2003 4:10:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk writes: > KB Williams wrote: > [snip] > >It is a shame that mkdoc fails to have a --ver option to tell us > >its version number. > > Do any of the DJGPP utilities have a version number? > > If we add -v or --version options to mkdoc, we should do it for the others > too, for consistency. > No question there. --part1_15d.29de6b17.2d0f8afe_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 12/15/2003 4:10:35= PM Eastern Standard Time, rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk writes:

KB Williams wrote:
[snip]
>It is a shame that mkdoc fails to have a --ver option to tell us
>its version number.

Do any of the DJGPP utilities have a version number?

If we add -v or --version options to mkdoc, we should do it for the others too, for consistency.

<= BR> No question there. --part1_15d.29de6b17.2d0f8afe_boundary--