X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3FA163F9.5AA2742C@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:18:17 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: New plan for 2.04
References: <3F9980BB DOT 9F366A48 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
	 <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0310281115580 DOT 32687 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	 <3F9ED98B DOT 75295116 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0310291023480 DOT 32530 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Esa A E Peuha wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
> 
> > There was quite a lot of discussion. You didn't actually post a patch
> > against CVS. Could post a patch against CVS, so that we can review it,
> > please?
> 
> There's nothing to patch, only a file to add (well, a small obvious
> Makefile change to have it compiled and included in libc.a).  I posted
> that file along with some remarks (available as 2003/02/10/07:08:30 in
> the archive), but no one commented that; there was discussion about the
> actual stack checking code that would be generated by gcc (which got
> improved).  Later I fixed the bug about stack traceback printing one
> line more than fits the screen, but I still don't know if 0x7e is the
> right value of signum.

Patch == diff, or whatever you want to call it. Please could you post a diff
that someone could apply to a CVS check-out, test with or review?

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone." -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek