X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:50:10 +0200 (EET)
From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: New plan for 2.04
In-Reply-To: <3F9ED98B.75295116@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0310291023480.32530@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References: <3F9980BB DOT 9F366A48 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
 <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0310281115580 DOT 32687 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
 <3F9ED98B DOT 75295116 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:

> There was quite a lot of discussion. You didn't actually post a patch against
> CVS. Could post a patch against CVS, so that we can review it, please?

There's nothing to patch, only a file to add (well, a small obvious
Makefile change to have it compiled and included in libc.a).  I posted
that file along with some remarks (available as 2003/02/10/07:08:30 in
the archive), but no one commented that; there was discussion about the
actual stack checking code that would be generated by gcc (which got
improved).  Later I fixed the bug about stack traceback printing one
line more than fits the screen, but I still don't know if 0x7e is the
right value of signum.

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/