Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:16:01 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: andrewdjgpp AT swiftdsl DOT com DOT au
Message-Id: <3405-Tue15Jul2003171600+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
In-reply-to: <000001c34ac0$6cc19cb0$0101a8c0@acp42g>
	(andrewdjgpp AT swiftdsl DOT com DOT au)
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 & LIBC - build process change (attempt #2)
References:  <000001c34ac0$6cc19cb0$0101a8c0 AT acp42g>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Andrew Cottrell" <andrewdjgpp AT swiftdsl DOT com DOT au>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:01:15 +1000
> 
> The patch consists of the following files:-
> 	gpp_opt.sed			NEW
> 	noprofpp.sed		NEW
> 	makefile.inc		Updated process for C++ files
> 	libemu\src\makefile	C++ files use the new process

Are we using Sed anywhere else in the build process?  If not, this
change adds a new requirement: to have Sed installed, and I thought we
want to keep the number of non-bundled packages to the bare minimum.