From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200306211133.h5LBXlpl002656@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: LIBM patch for GCC 3.3 - math changes
In-Reply-To: <000e01c337aa$7b238800$0100a8c0@acp42g> "from Andrew Cottrell at
 Jun 21, 2003 02:06:23 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 13:33:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Andrew Cottrell:
> *** \djgppcvs\include\libc\ieee.h       Wed Feb  5 18:10:52 2003
> --- ieee.h      Sat Jun 21 12:37:40 2003
> *************** typedef struct {
> *** 38,43 ****
> --- 38,56 ----
>     unsigned sign:1;
>   } long_double_t;
> 
> +
> + typedef union
> + {
> +   double d;
> +   double_t dt;
> + } _double_union_t;
> +
> + typedef union
> + {
> +   float f;
> +   long  l;
> + } _float_long_union;

Why aren't you using float_t here?


Right,

						MartinS