Message-ID: <00a401c31762$478888f0$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Fw: (fwd) Re: SIGILL 386 (illegal opcode)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 12:08:56 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > Now for the $64,000 question:-
> >
> > For the next alpha release do you think we should switch to GCC 3.2.3 or
> > move to 3.3 snapshots with the assumption that GCC 3.3 is realeased
before
> > the 2.04 is released?
> >
> > I don't have the time to build both sets of packages, but I can build
the
> > files with GCC 3.3 and upload them to clio and then when GCC 3.3 is
released
> > then these could become the next alpha after gcc 3.3 is released.
>
> I think we should stick to 3.2.x for a while. Certainly I don't think we
> should switch to gcc 3.3 until after the next alpha. I don't think it will
> have got much testing until then.
>
> We definitely need to get a gcc 3.2.x out there with the struct return
fix.

I should be able to make a test version of the 3.2.3 with the struct version
available at clio in a few days after I go through at leat 3 complete
re-builds to ensure that the 3.2.3 is capable of building everything.

Andrew