From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200305101158.h4ABwucf027657@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Reducing sbrk test on nmalloc]
In-Reply-To: <3EBCE61D.6861C887@yahoo.com> "from CBFalconer at May 10, 2003 07:44:29
 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:58:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to CBFalconer:
> at present I depend on NDEBUG being defined for production use.  I

Just "define NDEBUG 1" at the start of the file.

> don't want to have to physically revise the source to enable debug
> runs.  This has been in there from day one and nobody said
> anything.

When I tried it out I #defined NDEBUG because either you said so or I
had to (it was a long time ago).

This must have showed up in my patch that I posted (a long time
ago) to make that code compile.


Right,

						MartinS