From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: SIGILL 386 (illegal opcode)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:36:52 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
References: <200305071759 DOT h47HxQte028947 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <200305072355 DOT 16047 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <200305072055 DOT h47KtG6q010180 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <200305072055.h47KtG6q010180@envy.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200305080936.52719.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Wednesday 07 May 2003 23:55, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Problems with atomicity.h were recently discussed in gcc mailing
> > lists. Don't expect enything done with gcc-3.2.X. Let's see how it
> > will be in gcc-3.3 when it will be released (don't ask dates, I
> > don't know)
>
> It pre-released this week.  Too late to fix bugs, but not too soon to
> start building/testing it.

I built for DJGPP 2003/05/05 5 CVS snapshot from GCC-3.3 branch. No problems 
bootstrapping it. Hopefully Andrew is going to do more testing as he has 
sources which I used. GCC-3.3 snapshot and also GCC-3.2.3 release.

Andris