Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:33:28 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <9743-Mon28Apr2003063327+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200304271703.h3RH39p2004600@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
	(ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se)
Subject: Re: Yet another try on nan in strto{f,d,ld}
References:  <200304271703 DOT h3RH39p2004600 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:03:09 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> Uhoh! That was run in WINDOZE 98. In plain DOZE I get SIGFPE. Is that
> bad?

It's not good.  I think we should replace the FP assignment with an
assignment of a long long, or with a memcpy, then.