Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3EAC4195.67389371@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:46:13 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: make 3.80 test failures
References: <3EA820C2 DOT DBBDD50B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1659-Thu24Apr2003232926+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:37:06 +0100
> > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
[snip]
> > Built against
> > DJGPP 2.03 and 2.04 alpha 1 (...it's coming...) I get 3 failures:
> >
> > features/vpathplus
> > targets/INTERMEDIATE
> > targets/SECONDARY
> 
> Please show the tests and the script that pinpoints the error.

I don't quite understand what you mean. Those are the tests that "make check"
shows as failures. I didn't run any scripts.

BTW if I try:

    redir -eo make check

a lot more tests fail.

Invoking the test suite like so seems to give more results:

    make MAKETESTFLAGS="features/vpathplus -keep -verbose"

The particular parts that fail (as identified by the .diff files from the work
directory) with the 2.03 build are:

features/vpathplus: 2, 3
targets/INTERMEDIATE: 2
targets/SECONDARY: none

Hmmm, it's strange that SECONDARY doesn't fail, if I only run that test.

The particular parts that fail with 2.04 alpha 1 build are:

features/vpathplus: none
targets/INTERMEDIATE: none
targets/SECONDARY: 2, 3, 5

Hmmm, it's strange that vpathplus and INTERMEDIATE don't fail, if I only run a
test.

I rechecked my previous results and the test suite does say that
features/vpathplus, targets/INTERMEDIATE and targets/SECONDARY all fail for
both 2.03 and 2.04 alpha 1.

When I run a single test, it clears out the work directory, before running the
test. Is there some kind of weird interaction between tests here?

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]