Message-ID: <3EA69078.48E745D9@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:09:12 -0400
From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization: Ched Research
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: nmalloc revisited
References: <200304231105 DOT NAA07336 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <3EA67D55 DOT 63EF458C AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
> Martin Stromberg wrote:
> [snip]
> > I say push this new malloc() into this alpha release.
> [snip]
> 
> Sorry, but it's too late to put it in.
> 
> It needs more work and testing, before it can go into alpha 2. By
> "more testing" I mean it should at least be used to build the
> binaries that appear on Andrew's testing page.
> 
> Perhaps it can in to alpha 2.

I agree.  I am in the midst of the revisions - the fundamental
malloc package is done, but not the revisions to malldbg.  After
that I will try to hack up the .txh file for somebody to polish. 
It would create more confusion to switch interfaces later than to
wait a bit.  I have to fit all this in somewhere between other
chores.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!