X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200304231105.NAA07336@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: nmalloc revisited
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:05:21 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <6503-Tue22Apr2003175605+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Apr 22, 2003 05:56:06 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

HELO.

I say push this new malloc() into this alpha release. It would:

1. Let us see if it working. One earlier release was working fine for
   me (except the malloc debuggery).

2. Broaden the testing base big time.

3. Perhaps CBFalconer become motivated to correct the documentation
   (it's mostly compatible with what we already have if I've
   understood the discussion correctly).

4. If we aren't happy with the documentation for the beta release,
   bye-bye new code. Welcome back in five years or so.


Right,

						MartinS