Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:57:07 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <3995-Tue22Apr2003095706+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200304210840.KAA05189@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:40:38 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: @var, -, @code?
References:  <200304210840 DOT KAA05189 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:40:38 +0200 (MET DST)
> > 
> > Rephrase again is my recommendation:
> > 
> >   If @var{endp} is not a null pointer, it will be set to point
> >   to the first unconverted ...
> 
> But that says (C-code): "endp = <something>;" not "*endp =
> <something>;".

Then how about the following?

  The pointer to the first unconverted character will be stored in
  the object pointed to by @var{endp}, if @var{endp} is not a null
  pointer.