From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10304191903.AA25198@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: nmalloc revisited
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:03:28 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <3EA137D9.A02AE97F@yahoo.com> from "CBFalconer" at Apr 19, 2003 07:49:45 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> You might look at the tmalldbg source code for some usage.  It
> doesn't declare any of those intermediate names, just the usual
> malloc, free, etc.  The difference is in the link step.

If this package is included in the standard libc, how will this
work?  

The current hooks allow a single library for the library code and
no special linkage steps.  Unless the proposed way works with the
code in the standard library, I don't think we can use it.