From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200303181651.h2IGp7A15674@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: elefunt results
In-Reply-To: <2950-Tue18Mar2003162734+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> "from Eli Zaretskii
 at Mar 18, 2003 04:27:35 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:51:07 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > I do too. Except that makefile is some multi-make one. If we don't
> > care about other make implementations I could clean it up (and use
> > ./).
> 
> That makefile was heavily hacked to tailor it to DJGPP.  We don't
> expect to use any Make other than the GNU Make.  So if you need GNU
> Make specific features, please feel free to use them.

Ok. As I also added "redir -eo" to run the programs the PATH doesn't
have to be changed. So it turns out I only need:
Index: djgpp/tests/libc/ansi/math/elefunt/makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/tests/libc/ansi/math/elefunt/makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -p -u -r1.2 makefile
--- djgpp/tests/libc/ansi/math/elefunt/makefile 15 Jun 1999 07:27:55
-0000      
1.2
+++ djgpp/tests/libc/ansi/math/elefunt/makefile 18 Mar 2003 16:49:47
-0000
@@ -72,7 +72,9 @@ else  # no borland compiler, we use gcc
   LD = gcc
   LIBRARY_PATH := ../../../../../lib
   export LIBRARY_PATH
-  RUN =    # how to run the executables
+  RUN = redir -eo   # how to run the executables
 ifdef DEBUG
     # don't use -O!!
     CFLAGS = -g -Wall -fno-builtin $(INCLUDE) $(DEFINES)


Right,

						MartinS