From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200302231735.h1NHZ9006363@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Moving djasm
In-Reply-To: <6480-Sun23Feb2003003102+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
 "from Eli Zaretskii at Feb 23, 2003 00:31:02 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:35:09 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> Shouldn't we say %.info instead of %.inf?
> 
> > (Isn't .tex an incorrect extension?)
> 
> I'd prefer if we used *.txi.

So you want this:

Index: djgpp/src/makefile.inc
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/makefile.inc,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -p -u -r1.8 makefile.inc
--- djgpp/src/makefile.inc      2 Dec 2001 11:58:03 -0000       1.8
+++ djgpp/src/makefile.inc      23 Feb 2003 17:31:15 -0000
@@ -139,7 +139,10 @@ NOP = @$(MISC)
 
 .PRECIOUS: %.exe %.out %.err
 
-$(INFO)/%.inf : %.tex
+$(INFO)/%.info : %.tex
+       makeinfo --no-split $<
+
+$(INFO)/%.info : %.txi
        makeinfo --no-split $<
 
 $(BIN)/%.exe : $C %.o $L

? Note that the first line changes the original rule.

The other ones are my addition (which is what _I_ want).


Right,

						MartinS