Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3E463619.C47BF1F3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:06:01 +0000 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Take on __solve_symlinks() References: <3E286C07 DOT 7040200 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E2943DA DOT 523770FC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E297258 DOT 50906 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E2A9396 DOT EF36FE73 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E305DAB DOT 8090607 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E305D5A DOT 16693047 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E386A1C DOT 9050303 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E3940F9 DOT A66C7217 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E39880C DOT 4060607 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E398E01 DOT F62E2163 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E450859 DOT 9090508 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Laurynas Biveinis wrote: [snip] > I've created separate clean DJGPP installation with CVS libc and binaries > from clio.rice.edu dated 2003-02-01 and symlink testsuite still does not > fail here. Frankly, I think I've done everything I could at this point. > Maybe it's W98 vs W2K thing? Could somebody else with W98/W2K test > tests/libc/compat/unistd/xsymlink.c to see if it fails? In any case, I'm > unable to debug it here, so I won't for now until someone gives a clue. Have you tried running the small findfirst test program that I posted? I think the difference in behaviour may be down to findfirst. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]