Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:54:00 -0700
From: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Cc: debian-devel AT lists DOT debian DOT org
Subject: Re: Compiling Debian packages for DJGPP ?
Message-ID: <20030207225400.GA15263@taniwha.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	debian-devel AT lists DOT debian DOT org
References: <20030206194620 DOT GA30344 AT taniwha DOT org> <200302070826 DOT JAA20512 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200302070826.JAA20512@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:26:57AM +0100, Martin Stromberg wrote:
> Ehum... Somebody did take over it. IIRC, JT Williams did. And I have
> been messing with it too.

Hmm, that may well be, I don't remember :/

> But our main goal is to make it behave as WINDOZE 9x. We have already
> that in place, but there seemingly are bugs.

While I don't have time to work on it, I'm willing to help with how things are
meant to work:)

> My enthusiasm declined when I lost the primary partition contents. I
> didn't loose anything important as it was my scrap PC, but that meant
> a pause in the work, then something else more interesting came up and
> I haven't got back to it (yet).

Ouch. Was that lfn?

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak