Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3E3E56D6.321DB98D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:47:34 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: /djgpp/manifest
References: <10302030533 DOT AA14786 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Charles Sandmann wrote:
> 
> /djgpp/manifest in CVS seems "dead" - it contains the mft and ver files
> from 2.02.  They certainly don't seem to belong in "HEAD" - I suggest
> cvs removing them all.
> 
> OK?

That seems OK to me.
 
> Maybe the 2.03 files should have been checked in here (they never
> were) - but that's a separate issue.

I don't think they should be put there either. The build procedure puts the
right manifest/version/DSM files in the ZIPs.

If you're using CVS, you probably know which version of DJGPP you're using and
don't need the version file. ;)

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]