Message-ID: <001601c2c505$d2decb80$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: CVS get for next CLio update - okay or wait?
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:40:01 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

I just did a CVS get (4:25 AM Sunday 26th Jan UTC time, 5:25 PM OZ time) and
if no one indicates otherwise I will be using this to build the next 2.04
update for clio if I don't find any show stoppers.

Anyone know of any show stoppers in the CVS code where you would advise
against doing a build and leting people use it?

Once this release is done I will take a break if possible from doing any
updates until I sort out the following issues:-
1) Get a Rhide snapshot built with lastest Rhide, TV and CVS code. I have
done this in early 2002, but allot of water has been under the bridge since
then so this may take a while.
2) Check out all work arrounds that I have done in order to do a complete
build. This includes sorting out grep 2.5.1 build process and some other
problems. If anyone wants to help out I will be uploading my 2 build batch
files in the next clio update so people can see what the workarrounds I have
used.


Thanks,
Andrew