Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:41:03 -0500
Message-Id: <200301232041.h0NKf3D18684@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3E305173.9E89FA57@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:32:52 +0000)
Subject: Re: readv, writev [PATCH]
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030123082200 DOT 15630D AT is> <3E2FC531 DOT F37C6D24 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2427-Thu23Jan2003204136+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E305173 DOT 9E89FA57 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


Note that we already break read() and write() (or is it _read() and
_write()?) into multiple chunks just to get it over to the DOS
buffers.  Whatever we do for those should be fine for readv() and
writev(), I see no reason to merge that data into a single buffer.