Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:10:01 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <9743-Wed22Jan2003211001+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3E2DBF23.2EF2702@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:44:03 +0000)
Subject: Re: size_t and ssize_t
References: <200106192104 DOT XAA18859 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3E2D52C7 DOT 70E1DDEB AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2110-Tue21Jan2003210627+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E2DBF23 DOT 2EF2702 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:44:03 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> "z Specifies that a following d, i, o, u, x,or X conversion specifier applies
> to a size_t or the corresponding signed integer type argument; or that a
> following n conversion specifier applies to a pointer to a signed integer type
> corresponding to size_t argument."
> 
> I think that ssize_t should be a signed integer type corresponding to size_t.

Then let's do this.