Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 20:50:05 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2593-Mon20Jan2003205003+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.51.0301201436140.27624@sirppi.helsinki.fi> (message
	from Esa A E Peuha on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:03:40 +0200 (EET))
Subject: Re: Adding index entries to library docs
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0301171344540 DOT 17854 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
 <3E293BB0 DOT D9EFA8FF AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0301201436140 DOT 27624 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:03:40 +0200 (EET)
> From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
> 
> > Perhaps makedoc should generate a warning, if a node doesn't have an
> > @[fv]index statement?
> 
> Maybe, but ioctl currently has three nodes, and only one of these should
> have @findex ioctl.

Perhaps we should have 3 index entries and qualify each one somehow.
For example:

    @findex ioctl AT r{, DOS variant}